3 ms·
> The best content - done by passionate individuals for no monetary reasons - will stay. That's assuming these people have other jobs (which will have to someh
by lwansbrough 9y ago
> The best content - done by passionate individuals for no monetary reasons - will stay.
That's assuming these people have other jobs (which will have to somehow be funded by something other than ads or selling data -- bye bye 90% of Silicon Valley.) Having other jobs means they won't be able to spend as much time on it and quality will suffer.
> The good content will be kept afloat by donations.
Donations often don't stretch beyond what's required to do the work that's been done before (people don't often donate once the donation goal has been reached.) This stifles growth.
> The usual corporate content will be written off as "marketing expense".
So companies that derive their value from the content they produce and sell ads on have to write off their entire business model as a "marketing expense". Good idea. Say goodbye to virtually all online publishing that isn't paywalled already.
> The ad-supported worthless crap will disappear.
You mean like Google, YouTube, Facebook, Spotify, Twitter...?
- dingaling 9y ago> You mean like Google, YouTube, Facebook, Spotify, Twitter...? Three of those provide paid-for tiers. The other two that do not, well...