4 ms·
It increases the cost and complexity of an ISP tracking you, which is a win within itself. Plus some services share public IPs or are behind a global cache (e.g
by Someone1234 9y ago
It increases the cost and complexity of an ISP tracking you, which is a win within itself. Plus some services share public IPs or are behind a global cache (e.g. Cloudflare) making it harder to pinpoint exactly which endpoint you tried to access.
Is it perfect? No. It is better than yesterday? Yes.
I call these "micro-wins." One micro-win won't make a difference, but two, three, four, and so on eventually start to have an impact. And that's all we can hope for.
Even often cited VPNs just shift the problem downstream. Instead of your ISP monitoring you, the VPN provider themselves could, or if you host it yourself then your server/virtual server's ISP could. VPNs themselves are another "micro-win" but people often claim they're a complete bulletproof solution.
- amaccuish 9y agoNot sure why you're being downvoted; as tescos says here in the UK, every little helps :)
- bogomipz 9y ago>"I call these "micro-wins." I like this term :) It's also believe its a win when computer privacy and security begin to edge into main stream lexicon. Somewhat anecdotal but I recently saw that NordVPN is advertising on CNN.
- Sephr 9y agoUnencrypted SNI is still the global standard for TLS, and it is supported by most commerical tracking software. Tracking complexity has not been increased in practice.