3 ms·

Print version, no ads, single page, faster loading: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/09/AR2010090903350_pf.html http://www.washingt

• cryptoz 16y ago
  First, your linked page does have ads. You must have adblock on if you didn't see it. Second, traditional newspapers are struggling and it seems pretty mean to go out of your way to block their ads. The industry needs a new plan and a total overhaul but in the meantime, lets at least not direct people away from their only revenue source online.
  • RiderOfGiraffes 16y ago
    Huh, interesting. I was wondering why all the hate/down-votes. OK, I won't edit the original because that's what I wrote, and that's what's being down-voted - fair enough. Even so, it's still single page and much faster loading. I don't even really mind the ads, I just get annoyed at having to click through, click through, click through, ... Thanks for leaving the comment and helping me (and possibly others) learn, and not just down-voting and moving on.
• 9ec4c12949a4f3 16y ago
  VERY related. http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/ http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/