4 ms·
Just eliminate the various liability shields that have been enacted for third-party content. In certain areas (e.g. the personals website crackdown) we are movi
by tankerslay 8y ago
Just eliminate the various liability shields that have been enacted for third-party content. In certain areas (e.g. the personals website crackdown) we are moving in this direction already.
If you make a search engine vulnerable to a libel lawsuit because, for example, their search results make it look like Joe So-and-So was arrested for DUI (when it was actually Joe So-and-Sew or some such thing), they'll just stop indexing that stuff entirely.
Best to avoid creating new laws where old legal concepts will work fine.
- amarkov 8y agoIs that really the world we want, though? If Google is liable for third-party defamation, aren't they likely to deindex any negative news about anyone who threatens to sue them?
- tankerslay 8y agoIf it's about a public figure (even a limited-purpose public figure), there's no problem because that speech is already highly protected against libel claims. If it's basically just non-newsworthy information about private citizens, then I do not think they should be shielded from liability.