> Your ISP does not have access to most of your communication, social media usage and searches as that runs thru https. Access to TLS certs is plenty enough to

> Your ISP does not have access to most of your communication, social media usage and searches as that runs thru https. Access to TLS certs is plenty enough to sell. You hit pornhub.com at 2AM, or expecting-parents.com at 9am, or foxnews.com at midday? Each tells a significant story. I dare you to take a month of time stamped DNS requests and share with the internet. > Secondly an ISP charges you a subscription and that is their revenue model. They are not incentivised to build an elaborate profile on your in order to deliver advertisement. Are you trying to claim that a for-profit enterprise who has an opportunity to increase revenues using their current business model will decide against it, because it might be a bit of work? Explain to me who was responsible for the law change allowing ISPs to sell customer data? It sure wasn’t the customers. > Thirdly ISPs in most countries are required by law to support the police with surveillance information. That is done in transparent way (you can read the laws and ask your politicians LEA access is not what this article was about.