3 ms·
Maddening? No, it's glorious. A simple film, a dumb film, a useless film is one that wraps everything up in a tidy little bow with a neat little moral at the e
by InclinedPlane 9y ago
Maddening? No, it's glorious.
A simple film, a dumb film, a useless film is one that wraps everything up in a tidy little bow with a neat little moral at the end. A smart film, an impactful film is one that raises questions without simple answers. A film that makes you dwell on those questions, a film that makes you think about and come up with answers to those questions yourself. That's a life altering film. That's a film that sticks with you for life. That's a film that colors your whole perception of life and the Universe.
And that's what 2001 is. It's not a morsel to consume, be done with, and move on from. It's a piece of sand, an irritant, that will stick with you forever and will grow (as a pearl does) as you think about it and delve the depths of the questions it raises. That, in my opinion, is the highest form of art.
- andrewflnr 9y agoI think I mostly agree with you on the philosophy. Maybe I just missed it in 2001, but for an unanswered question to be interesting, I need to have some evidence, some way of getting traction on it. If I don't have a way to move forward with a question, I put it in the same bucket as simulationism and move on to something productive. The star child thing seemed like weirdness without a method, and the main question it raised in my mind was how it connected to anything at all. Maybe if I watched it again I would get more of it.