3 ms·
I'm not going to continue this. MySQL is technically inferior by almost every metric. Businesses don't know what they need, which is why they need something fle
by jimktrains2 9y ago
I'm not going to continue this. MySQL is technically inferior by almost every metric. Businesses don't know what they need, which is why they need something flexible and reliable, not something that will crap out.
I honestly don't know why anything but institutional inertia is even a sane reason to use MySQL. There are better rdbms. There are better key value stores.
- tomnipotent 9y ago> I honestly don't know why anything but institutional inertia is even a sane reason to use MySQL Because you clearly lack experience to make this kind of call, but that doesn't stop you from throwing around technical rhetoric like you know what you're talking about. You're essentially claiming that everyone that has or will choose MySQL is an idiot/doesn't know better, and that clearly you know more about the context of our problem, business, and challenges than we do.
- ben509 9y ago> You're essentially claiming that everyone that has or will choose MySQL is an idiot/doesn't know better... Why is that surprising? When I worked in a business to business compsec role, for instance, the vast majority of our customers didn't know how to use `ssh` properly or what public and private keys are. Just because someone has the title "dba" let alone "developer" doesn't mean they know the first thing about the relational model.