5 ms·
I see I'm getting hammered for my negativity, but I certainly meant it when I said in awe about the first part. It's magnificent, never mind the lunar gravity p
by interfixus 9y ago
I see I'm getting hammered for my negativity, but I certainly meant it when I said in awe about the first part. It's magnificent, never mind the lunar gravity problem, which I've never seen well done on film.
It's only a couple of months since I last tried - and gave up on - watching 2001 to the end. Probably my own shortcoming entirely - I see nothing but pretentious late sixties posing from the stargate and onwards.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- mcguire 9y agoI don't know. Looking at the mental landscape of a transhuman, pretentious late-sixties posing is probably the best you can hope for.
- itronitron 9y agoI tried to watch 2001 again about 8 years ago and had to put it on fast forward, at 10X speed, and even then I was still falling asleep through most of it
- colordrops 9y agoIf you had it at 10x you weren't really watching it.