> A small and limited government is a weak government. A weak government is susceptible to corruption. Your assertion isn't self evident. A government could ha

> A small and limited government is a weak government. A weak government is susceptible to corruption. Your assertion isn't self evident. A government could have great power within its defined scope of power and little power outside that scope. There is also a reasonable argument that as the scope and strength of government power increases so does the desire to corrupt and control that power. Which is more dangerous a corrupt but weak and limited government or a corrupt strong and expansive government?