> Neither does this one. Yes, athletes are in the public eye pretty much all the time. > It shouldn't be in there and even if it is it doesn't make it right.

> Neither does this one. Yes, athletes are in the public eye pretty much all the time. > It shouldn't be in there and even if it is it doesn't make it right. Your boss owns your time when he pays for it. If you're not being compensated for your time you are off-work and there is nothing so much off-work as a cheerleader having dinner. What if your boss pays for it in other ways? Like bad publicity and exposure to his company, or movie or TV show, or NFL team? If the "can you hear me now" Verizon guy, who now works for Sprint, was seen in public wearing an AT&T shirt, should he not be allowed to be fired because that poorly represents his employer, Sprint? > Sounds like a lot of fluff people would tell someone to accept a job with a shitty wage, crappy contract and no life of your own. You do realize that cheerleading jobs are part time and that tons and tons of women audition in the hopes of becoming an NFL cheerleader. Which is why they get paid a base salary of not much more than minimum wage. > Most people get jobs to get paid. Why not both?