That assumes one has a right to dictate how someone else will manage their private property. Ideas like a mandatory "living wage", that while possibly well-int

That assumes one has a right to dictate how someone else will manage their private property. Ideas like a mandatory "living wage", that while possibly well-intended, amount to coercive impositions that are rationalized by dogmatic self-righteousness, and end up having pretty severe negative unintended consequences. They're in the same class of laws as those prohibiting prostitution and drug-use.