For this to be a good argument you have to assume that the regulater understands all of these things and makes systematically better choices then the people who

For this to be a good argument you have to assume that the regulater understands all of these things and makes systematically better choices then the people who build the houses. Or it would require qualifing all materials before being uses. That would increase time before deployment massivly, making new devlopment less attractive. Economist talk about 'permissionless innovation' being incredible important for progress.