2 ms·
"here's the HIV level, but the incubation temperature went slightly out of range when I was processing it, so use caution interpreting it." there is no "slight
by readhn 9y ago
"here's the HIV level, but the incubation temperature went slightly out of range when I was processing it, so use caution interpreting it."
there is no "slightly out of range". Its either in the range or outside. Valid or invalid, when it comes to critical tests like these.
if temperature deviation is outside of acceptable deviation range then thats a system fault and result should have been considered invalid.
Back in the days there was much less regulatory oversight and products like that could slip through the cracks, Resulting to deaths, missed diagnosis etc etc.
The same with Teslas AP: its either 100% confident in the situation or not. If the car is not confident in whats happening - it should shut down. If that happens too often then the AP feature should be removed / completely disabled.
How many more people have to get into accidents? I know, if Musk's mom (knock on wood) was a victim of this feature then things would be taken more seriously.
- HeyLaughingBoy 9y agoIt's so nice to see people critique products they know nothing about with absolutely no useful context! You do realize that I gave a much simplified view of the situation as this is a web forum discussing a related subject, not an actual design review of the instrument, right? To any process I can set multiple "acceptable ranges" depending on what I want to accomplish. There can be a "reject" range, "ok, but warning" range, "perfect, no problem" range, or a "machine must be broken" range Everything is context dependent; nothing is absolute.