4 ms·
True, but Bede's history was wide-ranging and made no mention of Arthur or any other elements of his legend. To the extent that Arthur could have been real, he
by JacobAldridge 16y ago
True, but Bede's history was wide-ranging and made no mention of Arthur or any other elements of his legend.
To the extent that Arthur could have been real, he likely would have been a warrior-leader, rather than a king, fighting against the spreading Anglo-Saxon invaders.
- arethuza 16y agoWasn't Bede very much on the side of the, ultimately largely victorious, Anglo-Saxon invaders?