> HNs visceral reaction to factual inaccuracy. Interesting claim. In any case, I wasn't responding to your comment about theological noncognitivism, I was co

> HNs visceral reaction to factual inaccuracy. Interesting claim. In any case, I wasn't responding to your comment about theological noncognitivism, I was commenting on parent's reference to apophatic theology (theology which emphasizes our inability to know God with our minds) by merely driving the point home with some traits or characteristics commonly used to refer to God but also saying these things are not the entirety of God's being or character. The rest of your silliness doesn't really apply since I was not arguing "God is everything"