4 ms·
The AP recommends this so a reporter can describe the event without casting judgement on the cause of the event. This is similar to the reason why reporters sa
by davidgh 9y ago
The AP recommends this so a reporter can describe the event without casting judgement on the cause of the event.
This is similar to the reason why reporters say things like the “alleged” robber when there were perhaps many witnesses and maybe the individual in the report even confessed to the theft. It keeps the reporter in the position of fact rather than judgement.
This is important distinction for a reporter of an event. Non-reporters are not under the same requirement to maintain a position on non-judgement.
- c22 9y agoYou're publishing your editorial content to a large number of strangers here, it is not that different from the situation of reporters. While it is true that no such requirement exists, the reasons to choose the alternate wording are still the same.