13 ms·
You are describing evolution without an utility function. That won't work. We may be able to come up with an alternative utility function but, given past histor
by sergiosgc 9y ago
You are describing evolution without an utility function. That won't work. We may be able to come up with an alternative utility function but, given past history, I'm afraid we won't and will be aimlessly exploring the solution space.
A good parallel can be draw to evolution in painting. Up until the invention of photography, painting evolved to be photo-realistic. It made amazing strides, with breathtaking results. Once photography made that evolution path obsolete, painting struggled to find a new utility function. Out of that struggle, we got amazing outcomes in conveying feelings, a new utility function. Work in the first half of the XX century, from the likes of Munch, Dali, Picasso, optimized this function up to its limits. From then on? Painting is somewhat lost in the solution space without an utility function.
- darkerside 9y agoNew utility function seems to be consensus-based monetary value as modern art becomes a store for value and/or an investment.
- whatshisface 9y agoUtility keeps us honest, we really don't want to end up firing on all cylinders towards the perfect combination of drugs, VR and storytelling that will shut us down forever while explaining the Fermi paradox.
- darkerside 9y agoYou and I don't, but it sure starts to seem like most people are fine with that...