4 ms·
Does anyone have a link to statistical documentation of the efficacy of these "SEO" guys? And further, distinguishing the results of their black magic from sim
by ataggart 16y ago
Does anyone have a link to statistical documentation of the efficacy of these "SEO" guys? And further, distinguishing the results of their black magic from simply improving the inherent meaningfulness of the site in question and letting the search engines do the work of finding relevant pages? Every "SEO" guy I've ever met felt to me like a used car salesman whose methodology has all the rigor of reading chicken bones and goat entrails.
- gscott 16y ago> methodology has all the rigor of reading chicken bones and goat entrails SEO is supposed to be about the natural movement of the website by throwing things into the soup to make it taste better and as such move up in an organic fashion. The proof is in tracking the keywords or phrases you are hoping that will move up... I have been using AuthorityLabs.com for about a month now to track rankings and it has been working pretty well. It is a service worth paying for.
- hotmind 16y agoSEOcockpit: http://seocockpit.com http://seocockpit.com is also good. They start at $10 /mnth. I've no affiliation with them whatsoever, but I've used the service. Now I monitor my rankings, analytics, affiliate sales etc via iphone: http://www.seoiphoneapps.com http://www.seoiphoneapps.com
- petewailes 16y agoI could give you more case studies than I can shake a stick at. Ditto the guys at SEOmoz, Distilled, Bronco, Ayima, SEO Gadget, Verve, Outspoken Media... Disclosure: I know most of the guys at those companies. That aside, their work and expertise speaks for itself.