I do not agree that the scientific paper needs to be replaced. It should be complemented with the help of new tools, that is a very good thing, but I still want

I do not agree that the scientific paper needs to be replaced. It should be complemented with the help of new tools, that is a very good thing, but I still want the article. I work everyday with papers from decades ago, and I hope people will work with my papers in the future. How can I guarantee that researches of 2050 will be able to run my Jupyter notebooks? Moreover, it is not uncommon to not be able to publish source code. I can write about models and algorithms, but I am not allowed to publish the code I write for some projects.