3 ms·
This hole needs a fancy name. Patchowned? Pwneded ?
by zitterbewegung 9y ago
This hole needs a fancy name. Patchowned? Pwneded ?
- gruez 9y agoPatchEd
- paulie_a 9y agoNo, just no. Naming vulns is a theme that needs to go away
- sigjuice 9y agoAgreed. Every mundane bug or misfeature doesn't need its own website or 20-page analysis. Fix things and move on to the next thing that needs fixing. There is an endless supply of broken things.
- paulie_a 9y agoTo be fair I can appreciate the technical analysis of a security issue. The marketing is useless and just plain stupid
- flukus 9y agoI disagree, it's the only way to make the public aware of the issue and got the corporate hierarchy to expedite OS patching. Not that it's necessary in this case.
- rachelbythebay 9y agoI was hoping "bangpatch" (see URL). It's descriptive, and it's also a sly reference to the old-school days of UUCP.
- gaius 9y agoThe Patch Snatch Batch