The title of the article "News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier", but the HN headline is "Giving up reading news will make us hap

The title of the article "News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier", but the HN headline is "Giving up reading news will make us happier". The former says that not reading the news is individually beneficial, whereas latter implies that it is socially beneficial. Those are distinct enough qualities that, when coupled with missing "(2013)", inclines me to believe that the current headline is too misleading. It should be changed to reflect its source.