I completely agree that backdoors are a terrible invasion of privacy, that law enforcement gained absolutely nothing in this case, and that Apple should be laud

I completely agree that backdoors are a terrible invasion of privacy, that law enforcement gained absolutely nothing in this case, and that Apple should be lauded for their bold opposition to these requests. I'm merely attacking the specific line of argumentation the EFF is using. I consider it both intellectually shoddy and bound to be counter-productive. (Unfortunately, HN doesn't appear to understand such nuances.)