You are extremely casual with the truth; Your post is choke full of inaccuracies. The major one is: > The government stated that they needed apple to break ios

You are extremely casual with the truth; Your post is choke full of inaccuracies. The major one is: > The government stated that they needed apple to break ios in order to nail a creep. This was a lie. It was not. The specific question was: "[are you] testifying today that you and/or contractors that you employ could not achieve this without demanding an unwilling partner do it” The answer was affirmative, and correct for that point in time. It wasn't quite the "whole truth", but it was true. And there are any number of reasons you'd not want an unfinished project to become public. Also: the government's position was never that "this man would go free" or that they intend "to nail a creep". That man/creep was dead.