4 ms·
"Because I’ve been obsessed with static linking for as long as I can remember and I’m not really sure why." Glad I'm not the only one. When I was younger, I m
by earksiinni 9y ago
"Because I’ve been obsessed with static linking for as long as I can remember and I’m not really sure why."
Glad I'm not the only one.
When I was younger, I made a hobby Linux distro that ran completely on floppies with a custom filesystem hierarchy. All the binaries were in /Programs and were statically linked against uClibc. Even X was statically linked, there was some abandoned branch of XFree86 that ran with a VESA driver and fit under 1.44 MB. I thought that I was the bee's knees.
All this was still possible ~2007. Not sure how masochistic you'd have to be to try today.
- convery 9y agoSame, although people think it's silly I find it less error-prone. The same goes for C++ libraries, only using singe-header or amalgamations because it's less to support and ABIs wont break between versions.