> Of wrong comparisons: you should check the autopilot against a rested and concentrated driver that drives slowly and with a lot of care. Since in the statisti

> Of wrong comparisons: you should check the autopilot against a rested and concentrated driver that drives slowly and with a lot of care. Since in the statistics otherwise you do not account for the fact that when you drive, you are in control, and you can decide your level of safety. Such a diligent driver that goes to crash because of an immature software is terrible. Do these car companies test their software by just leaving it on all the time in a passive mode and measuring the deviance from the human driver? I'd think that at least in MV case, you'd see a higher incidence of lane following difference at this spot and it would warrant an investigation. Something like this isn't easy but for a company as ambitious as Tesla it doesn't sound unreasonable. Such a crash with such an easy repro should have been known about a long long time ago.