Just because you can't see the destructive nature of a technology does not mean it doesn't have one. Sometimes it's a matter of perspective and context. When g

Just because you can't see the destructive nature of a technology does not mean it doesn't have one. Sometimes it's a matter of perspective and context. When gunpowder was invented the purpose was medicinal, three centuries later we had cannons. Many things in our world seem positive on the onset, but give it some time and start looking from different angles and you're bound to find some potentially detrimental use. Granted some inventions like nuclear energy and nitroglycerin, both intended for constructive purposes, have a more obvious destructive potential. An example that better connects with your question is a company such as Monsanto.