I understand that point and I agree. What I'm saying is that upon reading the article closely, I noticed he was primarily promoting the "view infinite as arbitr

I understand that point and I agree. What I'm saying is that upon reading the article closely, I noticed he was primarily promoting the "view infinite as arbitrarily large" technique for dealing with the appearance of infinity. Example quote from article: "Interpret the problem as saying that the width of the capacitor is so large relative to its thickness that you don’t have to worry about edge effects."