> Mass intentional killing is wrong, pretty much everyone agrees with that Nope. Bomber Command in WWII and the use of nuclear weapons in WWII are both exampl

> Mass intentional killing is wrong, pretty much everyone agrees with that Nope. Bomber Command in WWII and the use of nuclear weapons in WWII are both examples where you will find nuanced, intelligent debate on both sides of the argument of whether "mass, intentional killing" being wrong or not. What you describe as "hate / pride for his country" ... but isn't that the reason most soldiers kill? That you even bother to call this out shows that you know the reasons for killing people need to be taken into account. I'm not making a statement on whether or not mass killing is wrong here, simply pointing out what seems obvious: it's far from black and white.