3 ms·
> I'm not making a slippery slope argument. I'm asking where you draw the line. Well, one starting point would be looking at past examples of antitrust action.
by Turing_Machine 9y ago
> I'm not making a slippery slope argument. I'm asking where you draw the line.
Well, one starting point would be looking at past examples of antitrust action. The AT&T and Standard Oil cases might be instructive.
> What part of the first amendment guarantees me YouTube has to host and monetize my videos?
It doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the First Amendment. I think they should either be declared a common carrier (and thus required to serve all without discrimination) or (conversely) they should have their DMCA safe harbor privileges revoked.
- colechristensen 9y ago>required to serve all without discrimination "discrimination" legally is about protected classes, and like I said expressed opinions aren't protected classes. Do you take 'required to serve all' as services without moderation? I don't really want to be surrounded by opinion anarchy.