4 ms·

> ... there's almost always somebody more unscrupulous, devout, or patriotic than you who knows or is willing to learn what it takes to finish the job ... If y

by drtz 9y ago

> ... there's almost always somebody more unscrupulous, devout, or patriotic than you who knows or is willing to learn what it takes to finish the job ... If you believe that doing something is wrong, the idea that someone more unscrupulous will do it if you do not must not be used as an excuse for doing that thing yourself. Giving in to this notion will prove yourself to be the one who is unscrupulous.

microcolonel 9y ago
> If you believe that doing something is wrong, the idea that someone more unscrupulous will do it if you do not must not be used as an excuse for doing that thing yourself. By involving yourself, you gain the opportunity to do the right thing (for the given the circumstances). If quitting accomplishes the same thing as sabotage or internal lobbying, then by all means.
bb88 9y ago
In 2018, the following statements are true: 1. If you're on an active battlefield, both sides have already agreed that killing people is morally justified. 2. If the enemy is shooting at you, he is not interested in the ethics of killing someone on a battlefield. 3. If ethics helped wars end, there would be a US Army 27th Ethics Brigade to parachute in, but there's not and probably never will be. If on a battlefield, given a choice between holding scrupulous ideals and living, most people would choose living.
- bitL 9y ago
  What's the point of life if you are forced to be evil, unquestionably and irrevocably? Why so many vets have PTSD and end up doing crazy things?
  - bb88 9y ago
    You have it backwatds. If someone wasn't willing to kill someone else on your country's behalf, most likely you wouldn't have the freedom to ask that question. Edited to add: The metaphysical question you posted might be better phrased to ask: What's the point of life if someone else is willing to extinguish it?

4 ms·

> ... there's almost always somebody more unscrupulous, devout, or patriotic than you who knows or is willing to learn what it takes to finish the job ... If y

by drtz 9y ago

microcolonel 9y ago
> If you believe that doing something is wrong, the idea that someone more unscrupulous will do it if you do not must not be used as an excuse for doing that thing yourself. By involving yourself, you gain the opportunity to do the right thing (for the given the circumstances). If quitting accomplishes the same thing as sabotage or internal lobbying, then by all means.
bb88 9y ago
In 2018, the following statements are true: 1. If you're on an active battlefield, both sides have already agreed that killing people is morally justified. 2. If the enemy is shooting at you, he is not interested in the ethics of killing someone on a battlefield. 3. If ethics helped wars end, there would be a US Army 27th Ethics Brigade to parachute in, but there's not and probably never will be. If on a battlefield, given a choice between holding scrupulous ideals and living, most people would choose living.
- bitL 9y ago
  What's the point of life if you are forced to be evil, unquestionably and irrevocably? Why so many vets have PTSD and end up doing crazy things?
  - bb88 9y ago
    You have it backwatds. If someone wasn't willing to kill someone else on your country's behalf, most likely you wouldn't have the freedom to ask that question. Edited to add: The metaphysical question you posted might be better phrased to ask: What's the point of life if someone else is willing to extinguish it?