3 ms·
I'm not really sure how blockchain is related to a potential "next" communication technology. Why not AR? Why not lasers n shit?
by jgh 9y ago
I'm not really sure how blockchain is related to a potential "next" communication technology. Why not AR? Why not lasers n shit?
- joejerryronnie 9y agoWait for it . . . "Quantum Blockchain" - Boom!
- koolba 9y agoQubitcoin! [1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qubit
- jamestimmins 9y agoYou're right. I was thinking "blockchain or another in-development technology", but was lazy in my phrasing. Other tech is equally as applicable.
- Geee 9y agoIt's possible to create distributed but capitalistic systems with blockchain. Without blockchain most distributed / P2P systems fail because they rely on volunteers to run the system.
- kodablah 9y agoI don't think that's why they fail. Lack of adoption primarily due to difficulty of use is mostly why they fail. Lots of us are willing to donate our resources, but that won't affect the success or failure of the platform. People need to be working on simple to use platforms, everything else is secondary (including scaling and featureset). Max effort needs to be towards onboarding, wizards, easy walkthroughs, etc. It's a goal in a project I'm doing and I urge others to prioritize similarly.
- Geee 9y agoBut still, with blockchain you can design all kinds of incentives directly in the protocol without anyone in control. I'm not saying it's easy or if it's actually viable, but blockchain has properties that could make P2P social network possible in economic sense.
- arisAlexis 9y agoTalking about a blockchain based social network. a laser based social network doesn't make much sense