3 ms·
> repeatedly called for Australian-style gun buybacks, which were mandatory, which are the same as confiscation. They were mandatory, however gun owners with r
by brandonjm 9y ago
> repeatedly called for Australian-style gun buybacks, which were mandatory, which are the same as confiscation.
They were mandatory, however gun owners with reasonable reasons (i.e. hunting, sport, recreation) were free to acquire a license to keep their guns (excluding military style weapons). You can currently acquire a semi-automatic rifle (under 10 rounds) with the proper licenses and reasons (farm worker, sport etc.)[1]
- There were no repercussions for illegal guns being handed in (someone handed in a rocket launcher).
- There were no laws preventing someone acquiring a license to keep their gun if they wanted (within the laws which were introduced).
- No police invaded homes to take weapons by force during the amnesty.
Australia's gun-amnesties/buybacks were not the same as confiscation.
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Australia#Firearms_categories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Australia#Firearms...