4 ms·

I'm familiar with that specific case but it's an exception to the rule. The OP seems to think that extra-judicial killings by drone strike are a common occurren

I'm familiar with that specific case but it's an exception to the rule. The OP seems to think that extra-judicial killings by drone strike are a common occurrence and the evidence does not support that. I'm not saying I support it from a moral standpoint but I don't think it's fair to call them extra-judicial except in a few cases.

ionised 9y ago
> I'm familiar with that specific case but it's an exception to the rule. The OP seems to think that extra-judicial killings by drone strike are a common occurrence and the evidence does not support that. No, it is the rule. Drone strikes are incredibly high in collateral damage. The estimate is 28 unidentified people for each 1 target; https://reprieve.org.uk/press/2014_11_25_us_drone_strikes_kill_28_each_target/ https://reprieve.org.uk/press/2014_11_25_us_drone_strikes_ki...