2 ms·
Yep. And who do you think have the easier time getting ingredients for an IED, the person with a gun or the person without a gun? Who has the better chance at
by reitanqild 9y ago
Yep. And who do you think have the easier time getting ingredients for an IED, the person with a gun or the person without a gun?
Who has the better chance at ambushing and getting away with the enemys weapons: the one with the gun or the one without a gun?
- chrischen 9y agoYou can do a lot of damage with IEDs, but you can’t overthrow the government with IEDs. Look at Turkey. The primary tool was encrypted communications and information dissemination. That’s modern power that citizens should have. Right now power comes from information and the preservation of speech and private communications, not a few handguns and rifles (or IEDs). When the 2nd amendment was written a gun was relatively way more powerful than it is in today’s world. If you had a group of men with guns you were basically on par with the government military.
- reitanqild 9y agoIMO Turkey has mostly failed now. However, I'm not saying I'd want them a civil war, just that it failed despite doing everything "right" it seems.