3 ms·
Making shooters and other kinds of serial killers into celebrities does a lot more to encourage future killers than it really 'educates' society on how to preve
by j-c-hewitt 9y ago
Making shooters and other kinds of serial killers into celebrities does a lot more to encourage future killers than it really 'educates' society on how to prevent it. Promoting these kinds of stories for sheer titillation purposes does more to undermine prevention of such crimes than anything else.
- neuronexmachina 9y agoYup. Here's the American Psychological Association statement about a study on the topic: http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2016/08/media-contagion.aspx http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2016/08/media-contagi... > “Unfortunately, we find that a cross-cutting trait among many profiles of mass shooters is desire for fame,” she said. This quest for fame among mass shooters skyrocketed since the mid-1990s “in correspondence to the emergence of widespread 24-hour news coverage on cable news programs, and the rise of the internet during the same period.” > She cited several media contagion models, most notably one proposed by Towers et al. (2015), which found the rate of mass shootings has escalated to an average of one every 12.5 days, and one school shooting on average every 31.6 days, compared to a pre-2000 level of about three events per year. “A possibility is that news of shooting is spread through social media in addition to mass media,” she said. > “If the mass media and social media enthusiasts make a pact to no longer share, reproduce or retweet the names, faces, detailed histories or long-winded statements of killers, we could see a dramatic reduction in mass shootings in one to two years,” she said. “Even conservatively, if the calculations of contagion modelers are correct, we should see at least a one-third reduction in shootings if the contagion is removed.”