3 ms·
Yeah I dunno. There's like at least 3 or 4 different ways of constructing "classes" without the Class keyword. Frankly, that's a mess. I get that each has it's
by plurgid 8y ago
Yeah I dunno.
There's like at least 3 or 4 different ways of constructing "classes" without the Class keyword. Frankly, that's a mess. I get that each has it's own advantages etc, but I don't WANT to figure out some hipster's clever new way of managing inheritance chains.
I want to use the supported method of creating classes within the language. I prefer usage of the "Class" keyword because no matter how the language changes from here on out, it's a pretty safe bet that "Class" is going to always be the rightest way to do it, and the one that everyone else will understand.
- Can_Not 8y agoHe's saying to prefer not using any version of classes, including the "hipster" alternatives to the class keyword, not just the class keyword itself. And I agree with him. But if I find the right use for classes, I enjoy using them. He was advocating for FP over OOP.