4 ms·
Sorry, but those are just two entirely different planes with very different requirement sets. One is a wide body the other is a narrow body, for starters. A350
by thesumofall 9y ago
Sorry, but those are just two entirely different planes with very different requirement sets. One is a wide body the other is a narrow body, for starters. A350 vs 787 is a slightly better, if still not perfect, comparison
- avs733 9y agoA better way to look at it is that they are two different generations of planes. I fly/have flown a lot in a prior role. Excepting the 747, which let you get so far away from the engines that it was often irrelevant, newer planes create significantly improved passenger experiences (ignoring seat pitch). The A350 (2013 First Flight) , A380 (2005FF), and B787 (2009FF) are significant cabin environmental quality improvements over the A330(1992FF), A340(1991FF), B777(1994FF). They aren't just using different materials that are using IMMENSELY different technology and computing power in the design process. That lets the engineers pay attention to details they couldn't before. For Comparison (look at the front and rear wings especially: 1994(B777era) F1-straight lines, single curves, few compound surfaces [0] 2005(B787era) F1-lots of curves, compound curse galore, intentionally designed interactions of surfaces [1] Thats the different in design capacity driven by computing tools and technology. [0] http://www.spannerhead.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Ferrari_412_T2.jpg http://www.spannerhead.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Ferrar... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_FIA_Formula_One_World_Championship#/media/File:Heikki_Kovalainen_Jerez_Feb_2009_3611a.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_FIA_Formula_One_World_Cha...
- sokoloff 9y agoUpper deck on an A380 was like sitting in a quiet living room, just with weird furniture. Totally surreal experience.
- tavert 9y ago2008 or 2017-2018 would be more dramatic examples of recent Formula 1 aero taken to extremes - 2009 was the most aerodynamically restricted year in recent regulations.
- avs733 9y agoI know but I was going for what lined up to make my point :) If you look at details, the progression from 94 to 2008 is HUGE but its very much in details. That was the point more so than figuring out which McLaren had the most appendages.