4 ms·
'De-Monetized' suggests that someone who produces a video has an automatic right to income. That's bonkers, it's already quite a service that Youtube allows you
by dec0dedab0de 9y ago
'De-Monetized' suggests that someone who produces a video has an automatic right to income. That's bonkers, it's already quite a service that Youtube allows you to upload your videos to reach an audience that you'd be hard pressed to serve from your own server. They do this for free. In the previous iteration of such platforms all the ad income would go to the owner of the website, not to the rights owners of the videos.
I tend to agree with you, especially since they could put ads directly in the videos. However, they changed their policy fairly recently. If it was money producers were relying on to live, then they are definitely going to be upset.
It's like when Apple pulls something from the AppStore because they want to release something similar. They shouldn't have tried to build a business on someone else's platform, but it's still shitty.
On another note: I hate fanatics, no matter of what plumage.
100% agree, no "however"
- dwighttk 9y ago>It's like when Apple pulls something from the AppStore because they want to release something similar. when did that happen?
- jacquesm 9y agoAppGratis.
- dwighttk 9y agowhat was the similar feature Apple wanted to release?
- jacquesm 9y agoApp discovery services.
- dwighttk 9y agoI don't know about that. iOS 7 didn't have any app discovery improvements in the App store. Unless you want to count slightly different top apps lists and the "Near me" feature. It wasn't until iOS 8 (a year and a half later) that they added the Explore tab.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- DrJokepu 9y agoDuring the early days of the App Store the guidelines prohibited duplicating system functionality, but that hasn’t been the case in a long time, wasn’t retroactive, didn’t apply to non-system Apple software and I’m not sure how strictly it was enforced in the first place anyway.
- gnu8 9y agoF.lux for example.
- dwighttk 9y agoWas f.lux ever available on the Mac App Store? I downloaded it for free from their website... It wasn't allowed on the iOS App Store because it needs access to private APIs.
- gnu8 9y agoI thought it was kicked out of the iOS App Store for using the private APIs, after it was accepted. That is fair on its face, because those are the rules Apple set. However, the F.lux developers pleaded with Apple to open up the APIs needed to implement their software and were ignored. Then Apple copied their functionality as a built in feature of the OS. So the full story doesn’t make Apple look good.
- dwighttk 9y agoIt was never on the App store, they just offered a download that could be installed without jailbreaking: https://justgetflux.com/sideload/ https://justgetflux.com/sideload/
- ruiramos 9y agoFlux
- hiccuphippo 9y agoNot sure about apple but it did happen with Twitter and third party clients.