4 ms·
Should people be forced to provide for a platform that they find hateful and offensive? You can make a point about government not being allowed to deny groups
by thomasfortes 9y ago
Should people be forced to provide for a platform that they find hateful and offensive?
You can make a point about government not being allowed to deny groups the freedom of speech, but there's absolutely nothing wrong with private people voting with their wallets to show where they stand in relation to speech that they feel that is threatening to them.
- NeonVice 9y agoThere is a difference between private people voting with their wallets and encouraging a mob to pressure a company to withdraw advertising from a company that they oppose politically.
- thomasfortes 9y agoAs far as I know, the woman attacked him and his colleagues personally multiple times, she is a threat to them, they are raising awareness about what is happening and calling for action, they are declaring in a public way that they will not do businness with anyone that supports them. It's not "encouraging a mob" if someone say "Hey, these companies are advertising with bigots and racists, let's do a boycott to show them that we will not tolerate this". What you are saying is that they should "shut up and dribble"? Stay quiet with their heads low while they are being constantly attacked? Calling for a boycott when you don't agree with someone is pretty far from "encouraging a mob" as you put.