The most critical thing you need to consider when evaluating talent is value over replacement.[0] While Hillary Clinton certainly had fantastic credentials (Sec

The most critical thing you need to consider when evaluating talent is value over replacement.[0] While Hillary Clinton certainly had fantastic credentials (Secretary of State, Senator) her track record for accomplishments[1] while in those positions is IMO indistinguishable from a fictitious replacement level politician. She was the presumptive nominee in 2008 and lost, but you could chalk that up to Barack Obama being highly competent. There isn't much proof that she was an extraordinary politician, in fact there is a large body of evidence to the contrary. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_over_replacement_player https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_over_replacement_player [1] https://www.thebalance.com/hillary-clinton-s-accomplishments-4101811 https://www.thebalance.com/hillary-clinton-s-accomplishments...