49 ms·
> he actually WAS an bad actor in the past To be clear, one of the main points of the article is that he was not a bad actor in the past; he saw sketchy behavi
by leroy_masochist 9y ago
> he actually WAS an bad actor in the past
To be clear, one of the main points of the article is that he was not a bad actor in the past; he saw sketchy behavior from a prospective investor and reported it to authorities, and the sketchy investigator then launched a smear campaign against him from another country.
- ubernostrum 9y agoThe parent comment seemed to be talking not about the specific case in the article, but about the general "right to be forgotten" and expressing an opinion about what the commenter perceived to be potential for misuse.