2 ms·
In some ways, the ideal scenario is to have a funded, privacy-aware NGO maintain a messenger service, but: https://blog.torproject.org/sunsetting-tor-messenger
by sshine 9y ago
In some ways, the ideal scenario is to have a funded, privacy-aware NGO maintain a messenger service, but:
https://blog.torproject.org/sunsetting-tor-messenger https://blog.torproject.org/sunsetting-tor-messenger
"We, the people" is such a fragile concept when it comes to resource stability (time, money, dedication). Looking at a project like Linux, there are commercial interests that fund a large part of the pipeline.
Running the actual network and developing the various messenger clients add a layer of organizational complexity that, in my perspective, only private companies have been able to honor, and only to the extent described by the OP.
One could settle for less Service, but then we have XMPP with various encryption schemes. Too complex to set up.
- ReverseCold 9y ago> Running the actual network The ideal would require no servers, because the chat would be fully peer to peer. People wanting to be anonymous could just connect through Tor. (Each user account is just a private key, etc, etc.) Of course, in reality everything is behind a NAT and/or firewall. It wouldn't be too difficult to have "dumb" servers that just exist to pass messages hosted by the community though.