3 ms·
a) If "everything means something" is at least equal in truth-value to "nothing means anything," it's simply not a matter of percentages. b) If I understand yo
by samirillian 9y ago
a) If "everything means something" is at least equal in truth-value to "nothing means anything," it's simply not a matter of percentages.
b) If I understand you correctly, I think you're sneaking the assumption of nihilism back into your argument. The "lie that tells the truth" could also very well describe "everything means something," since I undeniably experience meaningfulness as something and not as nothing, despite all scientific facts. Just as I experience you as another soul though I know you are "just" matter. And this undeniable experience of meaning would undeniably imply a course of action. Non-harm (not treating a soul like an object) most immediately coming to mind.