3 ms·
Congrats, you just described all of modern AI!
by hueving 9y ago
Congrats, you just described all of modern AI!
- lloeki 9y agoDo Bayes/Kalman filters count as (super simplistic) A.I. somehow?
- chirau 9y agoThey aren't. Marketing makes them AI though, but they aren't. Just the same way folks think they have 'big data'.
- dorgo 9y agoAI effect maybe? "As soon as AI successfully solves a problem, the problem is no longer a part of AI." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_effect This attitude I encountered already on HN: "By discounting artificial intelligence people can continue to feel unique and special."
- wodenokoto 9y agoYes. The only reason why machine learning was not called AI, is because funding for research into AI dried up in the AI winter. Recently Google decided to revive the AI term, and here we are.
- chirau 9y agoNah, it doesn't count. Unless you are a buzzword person. AI is data science but not all data science is AI.
- mrhappyunhappy 9y agoIt always bugs me when people throw AI buzzword around when they are talking about machine learning.
- denzil_correa 9y agoI found this a nice way to communicate the difference between AI, ML and Data Science [0]. TL;DR AI produces actions ML produces predictions Data Science produces insights [0] http://varianceexplained.org/r/ds-ml-ai/ http://varianceexplained.org/r/ds-ml-ai/
- tmsldd 9y agoWell, I would say there is not much difference... but AI, sounds much more PR
- eanzenberg 9y agoIsn’t an action just the highest probability of a set of actions per given time though?
- kriro 9y agoThere's a chapter on Bayesian stuff (maybe more, the book is at home) in "AI a Modern Approach" so I'd say the answer is yes. I remember it vividly because they use a dentist/toothache example :P I know "it's in AIAMA" is hardly a formal definition but it's good enough for me.