3 ms·
Wait a minute here -- You're saying that the US military is patent trolling with secure, multiparty chat patents? Can you link to said patents?
by tuxxy 9y ago
Wait a minute here -- You're saying that the US military is patent trolling with secure, multiparty chat patents?
Can you link to said patents?
- jrhurst 9y agoIt's not really trolling in this case since they actually use and develop on the technology
- alexkon 9y agoThe Ars Technica article on their lawsuit against Apple [1] said they advertised a product on their website but received zero revenue from that product and seemingly didn't have any engineers working on it. [1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/10/full-scale-of-apples-patent-loss-to-virnetx-is-now-clear-440-million/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/10/full-scale-of-ap... Edit: Added the link.
- asdsa5325 9y agoThe person is wrong. It's a private company that has the patent, the company works with the government. I don't know why he implies the government is involved in the patent suit, they are not.
- Sephr 9y ago"It's not too hard to imagine…" isn't exactly the same as saying "It's true that…". I don't have hard evidence, but it's not hard to imagine VirnetX being manipulated behind the scenes by the US government. Similar circumstances have happened in the past.