3 ms·
I think that's compared to loading from a 5400rpm mechanical hard drive. I'll easily believe that optane is 4.7x faster than that. I also expect most high-end
by nfriedly 9y ago
I think that's compared to loading from a 5400rpm mechanical hard drive. I'll easily believe that optane is 4.7x faster than that.
I also expect most high-end NVME SSDs are going to be in a similar ballpark, maybe "only" 4.5x faster or something.
- aseipp 9y agoOptane performs much better at low queue depths which accounts for many common workloads, and has better power usage at these depths -- this lets it compete with NVMe at the same performance for many tasks with a smaller footprint (e.g. battery). It's not all about peak GB/s, though to be fair not even Intel's blurb makes this obvious... That said it's quite possible NVMe drives will be "good enough" where PCI-e Optane never makes major inroads, even just in terms of pure volume. The dollar-per-GB needs to come down a lot, still. Optane in DIMM form is also still MIA. I'm extremely skeptical it will live up to the original hype it was put through ("thousands of times faster") but I imagine it will be able to outclass many competitors.