4 ms·

>You say that women in their 20s are better at something than men in their 20s I don't know what comment you read, but the comment I read said nothing remotely

>You say that women in their 20s are better at something than men in their 20s I don't know what comment you read, but the comment I read said nothing remotely close to this. If you want to paraphrase what they said, it'd be more like "the very small sample of women I was exposed to in a small amount of time at one single professional workplace were better prepared for the job than the very small sample of men I was exposed to in a small amount of time at one single professional workplace". That says absolutely nothing about men and women in general, no matter how much baseless controversy you want to drum up.

ShadowFaxSam 9y ago
Not trying to drum up any controversy and I fully admit it is a small sample size. As someone who falls in the demographic "Under 30 and Living in a Metropolitan City" I feel comfortable sharing some of my own personal and my friends experiences in their particular office as well. The dominant news story has always been the story women earn 80 percent less than men, but that was difficult to reconcile compared to what I was seeing in my work life. This article backed up some of those points. If you are looking for hard data to back up what I experienced, the article posted here is a perfect source.
- freehunter 9y ago
  I wasn't accusing you of trying to drum up controversy, I was accusing PunchTornado of doing that. They were the one trying to force you to extrapolate your limited experience to the entire population and then use that strawman for target practice.
  - PunchTornado 9y ago
    Well, way say it then if you don't want to generalise it and give an explanation for the findings in the article. However you put it, your comment says that it may be that women in their 20s are more organized because in my company I observed this. If this statement is ok with you then fine, but it wouldn't be ok to say it loudly in some companies.
- brianmcc 9y ago
  Don't worry your intent was clear - some people simply read what they want/expect to read, but some of us are still able to recognise a personal observation. Funny: reading HN comments I increasingly get the feeling a lot of folks aren't correctly reading or comprehending what's been written. Whether it's deliberate to support a strawman or a result of reading too quickly or something else I don't know but I often read a response and notice "hang on, that's really NOT what OP was saying...".
  - ShadowFaxSam 9y ago
    Thank you for this. I couldn't agree more with this in regards to some comments here. Especially when people share personal observations on a study that includes data, yet people cry "small sample size!". Of course its a small sample size, it's a personal experience of one.
dominotw 9y ago
the very small sample of men I was exposed to in a small amount of time at one single professional workplace were better programmers than the very small sample of women I was exposed to in a small amount of time at one single professional workplace

ShadowFaxSam 9y ago

Not trying to drum up any controversy and I fully admit it is a small sample size. As someone who falls in the demographic "Under 30 and Living in a Metropolitan City" I feel comfortable sharing some of my own personal and my friends experiences in their particular office as well. The dominant news story has always been the story women earn 80 percent less than men, but that was difficult to reconcile compared to what I was seeing in my work life. This article backed up some of those points. If you are looking for hard data to back up what I experienced, the article posted here is a perfect source.

freehunter 9y ago
I wasn't accusing you of trying to drum up controversy, I was accusing PunchTornado of doing that. They were the one trying to force you to extrapolate your limited experience to the entire population and then use that strawman for target practice.
- PunchTornado 9y ago
  Well, way say it then if you don't want to generalise it and give an explanation for the findings in the article. However you put it, your comment says that it may be that women in their 20s are more organized because in my company I observed this. If this statement is ok with you then fine, but it wouldn't be ok to say it loudly in some companies.
brianmcc 9y ago
Don't worry your intent was clear - some people simply read what they want/expect to read, but some of us are still able to recognise a personal observation. Funny: reading HN comments I increasingly get the feeling a lot of folks aren't correctly reading or comprehending what's been written. Whether it's deliberate to support a strawman or a result of reading too quickly or something else I don't know but I often read a response and notice "hang on, that's really NOT what OP was saying...".
- ShadowFaxSam 9y ago
  Thank you for this. I couldn't agree more with this in regards to some comments here. Especially when people share personal observations on a study that includes data, yet people cry "small sample size!". Of course its a small sample size, it's a personal experience of one.

dominotw 9y ago

the very small sample of men I was exposed to in a small amount of time at one single professional workplace were better programmers than the very small sample of women I was exposed to in a small amount of time at one single professional workplace