4 ms·

This looks nice. One thing though - you should consider using strings instead of numbers for the amounts. The problem is that numbers in JS are actually floats,

This looks nice. One thing though - you should consider using strings instead of numbers for the amounts. The problem is that numbers in JS are actually floats, and you lose precision on high values. Probably not going to make a big difference, but e.g. 100000000000000001 can't be represented as a number in JS.

VMG 9y ago
> consider using strings And because '1' + '1' === '11' is not the pinnacle of arithmetic either, consider using bignumber.js or a better language than JavaScript
- hakanito 9y ago
  So, what other language do you suggest for building an interactive web app?
  - VMG 9y ago
    The number of languages that compile to JS or WASM is increasing, maybe I'd use Elm or Rust.
    - hakanito 9y ago
      Yes but would it solve the floating point inaccuracies? Compiled to JS is JS after all
      - VMG 9y ago
        you could enforce proper types that do not have any inaccuracies
vertoc 9y ago
Ah good call - I will definitely be switching to either strings or, as another commenter pointed out, BigNumber. Thanks for catching this!