3 ms·
To me that's the slippery slope argument. Sure, someone else could have done it already, or could be doing it right now. But SINTEF is supposed to be reputabl
by tallanvor 9y ago
To me that's the slippery slope argument.
Sure, someone else could have done it already, or could be doing it right now. But SINTEF is supposed to be reputable research organization, and I think it's more than acceptable to expect them to properly handle any data they gather.
Grindr faces significant hurdles in improving security and complying with GDPR, and we do need to hold them to account, but that does not absolve SINTEF of their responsibilities either.