3 ms·
Audio from what I know is best with have multiple high speed cores, rather than many lower speed cores. (I use my machines for audio)
by timc3 9y ago
Audio from what I know is best with have multiple high speed cores, rather than many lower speed cores. (I use my machines for audio)
- jernfrost 9y agoAnd what are your processing times like? I use my Mac for video editing, but I have never had any problems doing that smoothly even on much weaker Macs. Only issue I have on Mac is compiling large programs.
- sno0ks 9y agoThe issue is with live streams of audio or virtual instruments with CPU heavy effects with very small amount of buffering (typically 64 samples @ 48kHz, which is 0.75ms). Also processing of instruments and effects for one track (+ relevant busses) has to be in series so more cores doesn't help a resource hungry signal chain. But of course they do greatly help overall effect/instrument count over many tracks.